In September I had t

Alex Tiller - Monday, October 15, 2007

In September I had the opportunity to tour three cattle ranches in Hawaii.  (Click on the photo to see additional pictures and read more)

Tips for Dealing with Hay Shortages and High Prices

Alex Tiller - Wednesday, October 03, 2007

I read a great piece by Dr. Roy Burris, a University of Kentucky agricultural extension professor on how to extend your grazing period to cope with hay shortages and high hay prices over the winter. (That link is a Microsoft Word document, so you’ll need Word in order to be able to read it – but I’ll hit the high points here.) Between the freezes over Easter and the dry weather since then, a lot of stockowners in the east are worried as hay prices go up, up, up – and the late-cut hay this year is looking to be a pretty sorry lot, so these are tips that can move a lot of numbers around on your balance sheet.

The first step is the obvious one – don’t feed your animals hay! You can shrink the hay feeding period by extending your grazing season; there are three good options that you can try.

The first option is to have your stock graze corn stalks. Ranchers in the west have been doing this for years, especially for cows that have dried up after their calves are weaned. Fencing and water are the issues here – you obviously need to control your herd and keep them well-watered while they’re nibbling out there. Temporary electric fencing and trucked-in water are inconveniences but they will buy up to forty days of additional grazing. Fields that yield 150 bushels of corn an acre will feed about 40 cow-days per acre; adjust that figure for the yield, since more corn leaves more stalks.

If we get decent moisture next month, then you can apply nitrogen on your empty fields and let fescue accumulate through mid-November – conveniently, that’s about the same time as the corn residue will run out. Nitrogen is pricey, but so is hay! You have to be a little bit careful about letting the animals eat – Dr. Burris recommends strip-grazing to control the rate at which the cows feed. You’ll need between an acre and an acre and a half per animal, and that will get you through to early February. With a little bit of luck on the weather, that means we’ve gotten two-thirds of the way through the winter with minimal use of hay – not a bad return for moving some fencing in and laying down N.

Finally, this might be the year to experiment with winter annuals like ryegrass. If we have a hard winter, they will have very limited growth, so don’t bet the ranch on this working out. Still, if you want to try some cold-tolerant winter annuals, that can take you through February, leaving only about 60 days of hay feeding.

One important note if you’re buying late-cut hay this year. That hay will need some supplements, and I join Dr. Burris in recommending a nutrient analysis for the hay you buy. As Dr. Burris says, poor quality hay in big bales is the most expensive feed there is. One warning – don’t supplement your hay with anhydrous ammonia treatment. That does boost protein yield, but you run the risk of the ammonia forming a compound, 4-methyl immidazole, which causes “crazy cow” syndrome like a lot of stockholders saw in the 1980s. If all you can get is low quality hay, then make the best of it, limit quantity and provide supplements, and keep a close eye on the animals’ body condition. Remember that the end goal is having a herd that will support a healthy, high calf yield next year.

History 101: Farm Crisis of the 80’s, what went wrong

Alex Tiller - Monday, September 10, 2007
Overview

The decade of the 1980’s saw a dramatic shift in the capital structure of American agriculture and the ownership of its assets.  A massive accumulation of farm debt in the 1970’s ran head-on into an unfavorable economic climate and incredibly high interest rates in the 1980’s.  The result was that many previously successful farmers went out of business and the agriculture land market hit rock bottom.

 Efficiency Leads to Change

Some of the pressure arose from new farming efficiencies.  Producing greater quantities of farm products required the efforts of fewer people thanks to new technology.   Given the capital intensive aspect of modern agriculture, farmers were under increasing pressure to become even more efficient.  This required substantial investments in modern farm machinery which is very expensive.  Tractors, a combine, new planters, grain storage and other technologies such as irrigation, lead to better production, but did not come cheap.  Add in the cost of land and the cost of capital to buy all of the above and it becomes obvious that margins get squeezed.  The result was extremely high debt to income ratios. 

 Interest Rates / Economics / Recession

During the mid 1970s, economic factors were good.  Interest rates were relatively low, so farmers could borrow cheaply. People in foreign countries wanted American agriculture product and had the money to pay for it, so foreign markets became important to the farmers.  Prices for ag land seemed reasonable so farmers were buying more land on credit to expand.  In the 80’s the economy went bad.  Outside economic factors forced interest rates up.  Farmers had to pay more for the loans they needed to operate each year. In addition, consumers tend to buy less during bad economic times, so the prices paid for farm commodities went down.

 

With less demand and lower prices for their products, many American farmers had no way to pay back the banks for the loans they had taken out. Many borrowed even more money, hoping that better crops and prices would rescue them in a year or two. It didn’t happen.

 Declining Farm Exports

In the 1980’s, foreign markets dried up driving prices down further. Russia invaded Afghanistan and President Jimmy Carter responded by stopping the shipment of US farm products to Russia. That embargo on farm products hurt the farm export market.  At the same time, other countries experienced hard economic times as well. U.S. farmers could not sell as many goods overseas as they previously had.  The same farmers had invested heavily into equipment to increase production capacity for a market that seemingly disappeared.

 Additional Factors

In the 70’s and early 80’s, the common held belief (mentality) in the farming community was that a farmer should own every acre he operated.  At the same time, new aggressive investors were entering the market.  This new investor added competition to the cost of land. The cost of every available acre was bid up far beyond its realistic economic value.  The new investors were not interested in the moderate but stable returns that farmland had historically provided.  Many entered into highly leveraged transactions accepting low cash on cash returns for the chance to profit from rapid appreciation.  The situation was very similar to what we are seeing in the current residential real estate market where speculators bought investment properties hoping to capitalize on the booming housing market only to get left making payments on homes they could not sell or rent when rates went up. 

 

Skyrocketing interest rates and declining farm exports (plummeting commodities prices) quickly led to a collapse in the market which eliminated many investors and farmers alike. 

 Lessons Learned

For the farmer, the solution for increasing profitability and reducing risk is a combination of equipment ownership, and some land ownership mixed with renting additional land to meet the maximum production possibility of the equipment.  Most farmers today recognize the advantage of outside investment capital.  They seek out land investors who prefer to enter into cash rent or crop share arrangements.  The need for farmers to reduce their debt has resulted in many farmers selling off portions of their farms to investors, and then leasing it back.  This creates an increase in their capital efficiency, reduces their debit to income rations/risk, and results in a better ROI.

Summary of Farm Progress Show 2007

Alex Tiller - Sunday, September 09, 2007

Farm Show 2007

Farm Progress Show 2007

The purpose of this trip was primarily to gain both general and detailed information on farming practices and techniques that I had never been exposed to and to learn about new technologies. 

 Equipment

I had the opportunity to watch field demonstrations of differing types of equipment including the newest combines, grain movers, tillers, and planters.  I also spent time learning about grain dyers and differing storage methods and the construction of grain bins.  Companies that represented irrigation systems were few and far between; I assume because I was in Illinois where irrigation is not common. 

Technology

When looking at new equipment and associated technologies, I was impressed to see the GPS technologies that I have read so much about put to use.  John Deere demonstrated a system that let a farmer sit in a machine such as a planter and never have to touch a single control, the steering wheel, or pedal.  They sold this as a system that prevents operator fatigue, but I would assume that at some point in the next 5/10 years many of the functions of the operator will be automated.  Virtually every manufacturer had some GPS functions and there were numerous third party vendors.  Caterpillar and Deere had the most powerful systems that were fully integrated in their new machines. 

 Genetics

I visited the 3 major seed producers and reviewed their newest hybrids.  Pioneer (Du Pont) / Monsanto / Dow.  I was fortunate enough to have an accredited Farm Manager (Dave) along with me to explain some of the differences in the Traits that were being displayed.  He was able to help me understand strengths and weaknesses between the different producers, and how some of the technologies are licensed between the companies.  He also provided historical reference and other interesting commentary. 

 

In the end, it was Dave’s opinion that Monsanto is years ahead of all competition.  The newer products that they showed us (some of which won’t be available until 2009/10) will reduce/eliminate other input costs that farmers currently have to add separately like nitrogen.  (they have created corn that uses nitrogen more efficiently) Monsanto made it clear that they plan to charge more for such a product and expect that farmers will be willing to pay a premium for cost, time, and fuel savings.  As evidence of Dave’s faith in the Monsanto product line, 80%+ of the farms he and his firm manages are planted with Monsanto corn or beans.  Monsanto also demonstrated a forthcoming omega-3 enriched soybean which they think will be very profitable although that will fit more into a specialty food production vertical.  (not for all beans)

 Industry Contact

I made many other industry contacts who were both knowledgeable and qualified and seemed happy to talk faming with me.