As I’ve discussed on this site several times before, there’s quite a controversy over how much biofuels have contributed to the historic run-up of food prices globally. A new UN report on food and agriculture indicates that biofuel production is responsible for about 15 percent of the rise in global food prices.
UN spokespeople have previously condemned biofuels in extremely aggressive language; one official called the use of farmland for fuel production a “crime against humanity”. Critics of biofuels alleged that the production of fuel from corn and other crops was responsible for 75 percent of the rise in food prices, a claim I disputed.
However, as experienced market analysts noted, the agricultural sector is an economically rational sector. High food prices and strong demand spur increases in output, and the demand for corn and other crops for biofuel production led, not to starvation, but to increased production of those crops. Food price rises are now slowing and reversing, according to food economists, as a result of increased production to meet strong demand. The world economic slowdown, while bad news overall, is also likely to push food prices back down from historic highs, particularly for staple crops like wheat.
Other analysts have pointed out that while food prices did rise, they did so at a considerably slower rate than other commodities. While it is natural for people facing high food prices to try and pin the blame for the situation, the simple fact is that biofuels represent only a small part of the problem, and one that will be fixed over time by market forces.


Comments
Post has no comments.